原文传递
Seismic Performance Evaluation of Posttensioned Hybrid Precast Wall-Frame Buildings and Comparison with Shear Wall-Frame Buildings
| 题名： | Seismic Performance Evaluation of Posttensioned Hybrid Precast Wall-Frame Buildings and Comparison with Shear Wall-Frame Buildings |
| 正文语种： | 英文 |
| 作者： | H. A. D. Samith Buddika;Anil C. Wijeyewickrema, Ph.D. |
| 作者单位： | Tokyo Institute of Technology |
| 关键词： | Frame shear ratio; Posttensioned hybrid precast wall-frame buildings; Risk-targeted maximum considered earthquake; Seismic effects; Shear wall-frame building; Vertical component of earthquake motion. |
| 摘要： | Seismic performance of posttensioned hybrid precast wall systems has been mainly studied in the past without considering the interaction of the wall system with the rest of the structure. In the present study, the multilevel seismic response of posttensioned hybrid precast wall-frame (PWF) buildings is evaluated using nonlinear response history analysis and compared with the response of shear wall-frame (SWF) buildings under imidirectional excitation. For that purpose, three-dimensional finite-element models of code-compliant 4- and 8-story PWF and SWF buildings designed with different frame shear ratios are considered. The performance of buildings is evaluated under spectrum-matched earthquake motions to represent two levels of shaking viz the design earthquake (DE) level and the risk-targeted maximum considered earthquake (MCEr) level. The effect of the vertical component of earthquake motion on the peak response indicators of both types of buildings is also studied. It is determined that the seismic performance of PWF buildings is superior to SWF buildings in terms of limiting structural damage under the DE-level and the MCER-level ground motions’ despite the relatively larger roof drifts observed in the PWF buildings; however, nonstructural damage caused by floor accelerations is more pronounced in the PWF buildings. In addition, it is determined that the inclusion of the vertical component of earthquake motion does not significantly affect the peak response indicators of the PWF and SWF buildings considered in this study. DOI: 10.106l/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001466. © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers. |
| 出版日期： | 2016.06 |
| 出版年： | 2016 |
| 期刊名称： | Journal of Structural Engineering |
| 卷： | Vol.142 |
| 期： | NO.06 |
| 页码： | 04016021 |
相关文献
- Nonlinear Modeling of Wood-Frame Shear Wall Systems for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering: Recommendations for the ASCE 41 Standard
- PCI Journalannounces authors of award-winning papers for 2015
- Seismic Performance of Timber–Steel Hybrid Structures. I: Subassembly Testing and Numerical Modeling
- Seismic response of precast, posttensioned concrete jointed wall systems designed for low- to midrise buildings using the direct displacement-based approach
- Practical Nonlinear Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls
- Testing and Modeling of Wood-Masonry Hybrid Wall Assembly
检索历史
应用推荐
