原文传递 VALIDATION OF GENERALIZED DELAY MODEL FOR VEHICLE-ACTUATED TRAFFIC SIGNALS.
题名: VALIDATION OF GENERALIZED DELAY MODEL FOR VEHICLE-ACTUATED TRAFFIC SIGNALS.
作者: Rouphail-NM; Anwar-M; Fambro-DB; Sloup-P; Perez-CE
关键词: TRAFFIC-ACTUATED-SIGNALS; HIGHWAY-CAPACITY-MANUAL; ESTIMATING-; TRAFFIC-DELAY; SIGNALIZED-INTERSECTIONS; TRAFFIC-SIMULATION-MODELS; FIELD-DATA; GENERALIZED-DELAY-MODEL; VALIDATION-
摘要: One limitation of the "Highway Capacity Manual" (HCM) model for estimating delay at signalized intersections is its inadequate treatment of vehicle-actuated traffic signals. For example, the current delay model uses a single adjustment for all types of actuated control and is not sensitive to changes in actuated controller settings. The objective in this paper was to use TRAF-NETSIM and field data to evaluate a generalized delay model developed to overcome some of these deficiencies. NETSIM was used to estimate delay at an isolated intersection under actuated control, and the delay values obtained from NETSIM were then compared with those estimated by the generalized delay model. In addition, field data were collected from sites in North Carolina, and delays observed in the field were compared with those estimated by the generalized delay model. The delays estimated by the generalized model were comparable with the delays estimated by NETSIM. The data compared favorably for degrees of saturation of less than 0.8. However, at higher degrees of saturation, the generalized model produced delays that were higher than NETSIM's. Some possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed. The delays estimated by the generalized model were comparable with delays observed in the field. Researchers have concluded that the generalized delay model is sensitive to changes in traffic volumes and vehicle-actuated controller settings and that the generalized delay model is much improved over the current HCM model in estimating delay at vehicle-actuated traffic signals.
总页数: Transportation Research Record. 1997. (1572) pp105-111 (4 Fig., 4 Tab., 9 Ref.)
报告类型: 科技报告
检索历史
应用推荐