摘要: |
There is an ever-increasing tendency towards standardising principles, policies and practices worldwide. As far as the definition of a traffic accident fatality is concerned, however, there is still a large range of definitions currently in use by different countries. Some of the more common definitions include: immediate death and death within 24 hours of a traffic accident (Portugal), or death 3 days (Republic of Korea), 7 days (Italy), 30 days (most European countries) or 1 year (USA) after a traffic accident. Attempts have also been made to develop (universal) correction factors to allow for comparison amongst countries with different fatality definitions. However, applying such correction factors is problematic. The longer the period in which a traffic accident casualty dies after an accident, the greater the chance the cause of this death is not registered as being from a road traffic accident but rather from complications, which arose from the accident (e.g. pneumonia after fractured ribs sustained by a vehicle driver during an accident). The accuracy of fatality statistics is therefore diminished by longer-period definitions of traffic accident fatalities. In the light of the above-mentioned problems, this paper investigates the consequences of using the 6-day definition in South Africa, the merits of changing this definition to a 30-day definition, as well as the possible implications this is likely to have in terms of procedure and processes. For the covering abstract and the URL of the conference see ITRD E205670. (Author/publisher). |