当前位置: 首页> 国外交通期刊数据库 >详情
原文传递 Structural Behavior of Masonry Beams with Alternative Shear Reinforcement
题名: Structural Behavior of Masonry Beams with Alternative Shear Reinforcement
正文语种: eng
作者: Penales, Jeeric;Zohrehheydariha, Jamshid;Das, Sreekanta;Banting, Bennett
作者单位: Univ Windsor Dept Civil & Environm Engn Windsor ON N9B 3P4 Canada;Univ Windsor Dept Civil & Environm Engn Windsor ON N9B 3P4 Canada;Univ Windsor Dept Civil & Environm Engn Windsor ON N9B 3P4 Canada;Canada Masonry Design Ctr Tech Serv Engn Masonry 360 Super Blvd Mississauga ON L5T 2N7 Canada
关键词: Concrete block;Masonry beams;Alternative shear reinforcement;Codes and standards
摘要: Shear reinforcement, or stirrups, for reinforced masonry beams made of concrete blocks are placed inside the cells of the units. Since it is a requirement by masonry standards for shear stirrups to hook around the longitudinal reinforcement, the placement of conventional steel rebar as shear reinforcement in 200 mm (8 in.) or narrower masonry beams becomes challenging. Even the smallest size steel rebar available in Canada [10M or 11.3 mm (0.44 in.) actual diameter rebar], a standard hook detail is difficult for a mason to accommodate within field construction conditions. Hence, the current study investigated two different alternative shear stirrup configurations, namely, the use of 8-mm (5/16 in:) diameter smooth steel bars and the use of commercially available repurposed bed joint wire reinforcement. The current study showed that the masonry beams with the alternative stirrup details exhibited similar ductility as the masonry beam built with conventional steel rebar. The beam containing the bed joint wire as shear stirrups enhanced the capacity of the beam slightly more than the beams with conventional rebar and with the 8 mm (5/16 in:) smooth bar. Most importantly, the use of bed joint wire as shear reinforcement reduced crack width in a similar manner as the conventional rebar. In addition, the study found that the Canadian and American standards overestimated the shear strength of narrow masonry beams. The present study also found that the directionally based strength reduction factor (Chi factor,.) recommended in the Canadian design standard is overly conservative. (C) 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
出版年: 2021
期刊名称: Journal of Structural Engineering
卷: 147
期: 3
页码: 04021002.1-04021002.12
检索历史
应用推荐