题名: |
A comparative analysis of vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-rigid fixed barrier frontal impacts. |
作者: |
BARBAT-S (Ford Motor Co, USA); LI-X (Ford Motor Co, USA); PRASAD-P (Ford Motor Co, USA) |
关键词: |
CONFERENCE-; 8525-; IMPACT-TEST-VEH; 1648-; SHAPE-; 9073-; HEAD-ON-COLLISION; 1640-; DELIVERY-VEHICLE; 1234-; CAR-; 1243-; FOUR-WHEEL-DRIVE; 1321-; FRONT-; 9025-; STIFFNESS-; 5931-; WEIGHT-; 5485- |
摘要: |
The relationship between designing for both rigid fixed barrier (RFB) and vehicle-to-vehicle tests is a topical area of research. Specifically, vehicle-to-vehicle compatibility has been a topic of keen interest to many researchers, and the interplay between the two aspects of design is presently addressed. In this paper, the studied vehicles for potential vehicle-to-vehicle impacts included: sport utility vehicles (SUVs), Pickups (PUs), and passenger cars. The SUV/PU-to-Car frontal impact tests were compared to those obtained from vehicle-to-rigid fixed barrier frontal impacts. Acceleration pulses at the B-pillar/rocker as well as dash and cabin intrusions were monitored and compared. Additionally, the energy distributions in SUV/PU-to-Car crash tests were compared to those of single vehicle-to-RFB tests. It was concluded from the analysis that vehicle weight and front-end stiffness were not always the overriding factors dictating performance. Design alternatives that have positive impact on the distribution of energy on both vehicles involved in a crash were shown to provide improvement in vehicle compatibility. In the present work, it was also shown that good geometrical interaction in SUV/PU-to-Car impact was fundamental in providing self and partner risk-reducing potential. Moreover, the effect of geometry was shown to possibly mask the effects of mass and stiffness. |
总页数: |
PROCEEDINGS OF 17TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON THE ENHANCED SAFETY OF VEHICLES, HELD AMSTERDAM, THE NETHERLANDS, 4-7 JUNE 2001. CD ROM. 2001. (DOT HS 809220) 8p (5 Refs.) |
报告类型: |
科技报告 |