摘要: |
This section presents numerical experiments that were undertaken to evaluate the performance of the proposed solution approach and assess advantages and disadvantages from enforcing emission restrictions within ECAs. This study considers the French Asia Line 3 route (Figure 3), which is served by CMA CGM (2016) liner shipping company. This liner shipping route connects North Europe, Red Sea and Asia. The port rotation for the French Asia Line 3 route includes 13 ports of call (the distances between consequent ports in nautical miles are shown in parenthesis and were retrieved from the world seaports catalogue[1]), where the Port of Kelang (Malaysia) and Port of Le Havre (France) are visited twice: 1. Rotterdam, NL (341) ― 2. Hamburg, DE (426) ― 3. Antwerp, BE (244) 4. Le Havre, FR (4,403) ― 5. Jeddah, SA (4,455) 6. Port Kelang, MY (2,835) ― 7. Ningbo, CN (87) ― 8. Shanghai, CN (606) ― 9. Xiamen, CN (731) ― 10. Chiwan, CN (395) ― 11. Yantian, CN (2,045) ― 12. Port Kelang, MY (8,857) ― 13. Le Havre, FR (355) ― 1. Rotterdam, NL. |