摘要: |
The South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT) and many
other state departments of transportation (DOT�s) have used the Ohio Department of Transportation�s
(ODOT) Typical Moisture Density Curves for the compaction of
granular soil materials. However, the ODOT Materials Manual states
�Moisture-Density proctor curves and controls were originally
developed to be used on cohesive (clays and silts) soils. Errors or
complications arise when trying to extrapolate these principals to
granular materials.� Therefore, additional information is needed by
the SDDOT in assessing compaction of these materials. SDDOT is
also using more materials recycled from portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements and asphalt
concrete pavements as subbase and base courses. Recycled materials
are placed using the test strip method to determine how much effort is
needed to achieve acceptable levels of compaction. Test strips work
well for large areas but become problematic for small areas.
SDDOT has identified a need to reevaluate how they determine
whether granular material has been compacted to the desired density.
Most compaction testing has been performed using the nuclear gauge
or sand cone methods, and the in-place density standard is determined
by either the use of a test strip or a moisture density relation curve
(Proctor). Some DOTs have started using newer methods such as the
lightweight deflectometer (LWD), dynamic cone penetrometer
(DCP), proof rolling and the use of intelligent compaction. The
SDDOT wishes to examine how other DOTs determine the in-place
density of granular materials. The SDDOT also wishes to determine
whether the current Ohio curves are adequate for their needs or
should be updated and whether the SDDOT needs to use different test
methods to ensure adequate compaction. |