原文传递
Crew decision making under stress
| 题名： | Crew decision making under stress |
| 作者： | Orasanu, J. |
| 关键词： | decision；stress；akin；personality；difference；strategies；information；strategy；profiles；abnormal |
| 摘要： | Flight crews must make decisions and take action when systems fail or emergencies arise during flight. These situations may involve high stress. Full-missiion flight simulation studies have shown that crews differ in how effectively they cope in these circumstances, judged by operational errors and crew coordination. The present study analyzed the problem solving and decision making strategies used by crews led by captains fitting three different personality profiles. Our goal was to identify more and less effective strategies that could serve as the basis for crew selection or training. Methods: Twelve 3-member B-727 crews flew a 5-leg mission simulated flight over 1 1/2 days. Two legs included 4 abnormal events that required decisions during high workload periods. Transcripts of videotapes were analyzed to describe decision making strategies. Crew performance (errors and coordination) was judged on-line and from videotapes by check airmen. Results: Based on a median split of crew performance errors, analyses to date indicate a difference in general strategy between crews who make more or less errors. Higher performance crews showed greater situational awareness - they responded quickly to cues and interpreted them appropriately. They requested more decision relevant information and took into account more constraints. Lower performing crews showed poorer situational awareness, planning, constraint sensitivity, and coordination. The major difference between higher and lower performing crews was that poorer crews made quick decisions and then collected information to confirm their decision. Conclusion: Differences in overall crew performance were associated with differences in situational awareness, information management, and decision strategy. Captain personality profiles were associated with these differences, a finding with implications for crew selection and training. |
| 报告类型： | 科技报告 |
相关文献
- Synthesis of the "State-of-the-Practice for Advancing Planning and Operations Integration Opportunities within Transportation Agencies", Summary.
- Synthesis of the "State-of-the-Practice for Advancing Planning and Operations Integration Opportunities within Transportation Agencies".
- SARDA: An Integrated Concept for Airport Surface Operations Management.
- Addressing Uncertainty About Future Airport Activity Levels in Airport Decision Making.
- Decision Support Model to Understand Route Choice Decisions and Siting of Facilities in Emergency Evacuation. Final Report.
- Gateway: Volume 5, Number 1
检索历史
应用推荐
