原文传递
Defining the Relationship Between Human Error Classes and Technology Intervention Strategies
| 题名： | Defining the Relationship Between Human Error Classes and Technology Intervention Strategies |
| 作者： | Wiegmann, Douglas A.; Rantanen, Eas M. |
| 关键词： | relationship；strategies；technology；between；human；class；technological；inter；sses；variability |
| 摘要： | The modus operandi in addressing human error in aviation systems is predominantly that of technological interventions or fixes. Such interventions exhibit considerable variability both in terms of sophistication and application. Some technological interventions address human error directly while others do so only indirectly. Some attempt to eliminate the occurrence of errors altogether whereas others look to reduce the negative consequences of these errors. In any case, technological interventions add to the complexity of the systems and may interact with other system components in unforeseeable ways and often create opportunities for novel human errors. Consequently, there is a need to develop standards for evaluating the potential safety benefit of each of these intervention products so that resources can be effectively invested to produce the biggest benefit to flight safety as well as to mitigate any adverse ramifications. The purpose of this project was to help define the relationship between human error and technological interventions, with the ultimate goal of developing a set of standards for evaluating or measuring the potential benefits of new human error fixes. |
| 报告类型： | 科技报告 |
相关文献
- Defining the Relationship Between Human Error Classes and Technology Intervention Strategies. Final Report.
- Intervention strategies for the management of human error
- The Human Factors Analysis and ClassiBcacion System — HFACS
- Developing a Methodology for Assessing Safety Programs Targeting Human Error in Aviation.
- Human Error Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS); Final rept
检索历史
应用推荐
