摘要: |
There are times when a contractor believes its right to a time extension is so obvious that it does not need to support its claim with a typical scheduling analysis. This can occur when the contractor thinks that the owner is on the same page as to why the project was delayed. This months case, Appeal ofWright Brothers, The Building Company, Eagle LLC, provides an interesting lesson about this topic, explaining how a contractor that was delayed on a project by more than three years thought it had an understanding with the federal government that it was entitled to a time extension and additional money, only to lose the case entirely. |