详情

原文传递 Flight Crew Survey Responses from the Interval Management (IM) Avionics Phase 2 Flight Test

题名：	Flight Crew Survey Responses from the Interval Management (IM) Avionics Phase 2 Flight Test
作者：	Baxley, B. T.; Swieringa, K. A.; Wilson, S. R.; Roper, R. D.; Hubbs, C. E.; Goess, P. A.; Shay, R. F.
关键词：	Avionics##Deceleration##Air traffic control##Crew procedures (inflight)##Crew procedures (preflight)##Flight tests##Management systems##Spacing##Prototypes##Flight crews##Controllers##
摘要：	The Interval Management (IM) Avionics Phase 2 flight test used three aircraft over a nineteen day period to operationally evaluate a prototype IM avionics. Quantitative data were collected on aircraft state data and IM spacing algorithm performance, and qualitative data were collected through end-of-scenario and end-of-day flight crew surveys. The majority of the IM operations met the performance goals established for spacing accuracy at the Achieve-by Point and the Planned Termination Point, however there were operations that did not meet goals for a variety of reasons. While the positive spacing accuracy results demonstrate the prototype IM avionics can contribute to the overall air traffic goal, critical issues were also identified that need to be addressed to enhance IM performance. The first category was those issues that impacted the conduct and results of the flight test, but are not part of the IM concept or procedures. These included the design of arrival and approach procedures was not ideal to support speed as the primary control mechanism, the ground-side of the Air Traffic Management Technology Demonstration (ATD-1) integrated concept of operations was not part of the flight test, and the high workload to manually enter the information required to conduct an IM operation. The second category was issues associated with the IM spacing algorithm or flight crew procedures. These issues include the high frequency of IM speed changes and reversals (accelerations), a mismatch between the deceleration rate used by the spacing algorithm and the actual aircraft performance, and some spacing error calculations were sensitive to normal operational variations in aircraft airspeed or altitude which triggered additional IM speed changes. Once the issues in these two categories are addressed, the future IM avionics should have considerable promise supporting the goals of improving system throughput and aircraft efficiency.
总页数：	16
报告类型：	科技报告