原文传递
Amenity or Necessity Street Standards as Parking Policy
| 题名： | Amenity or Necessity Street Standards as Parking Policy |
| 作者： | Guo, Z.; Rivasplata, C.; Lee, R.; Keyon, D.; Schloeter, L. |
| 关键词： | Street width##Parking##Standards##Subdivisions##Private communities##Parking policy## |
| 摘要： | This paper explores the rationales underlying the use of minimum street width requirements to mandate street parking. A survey of 97 cities reveals that this mandate is not a technical necessity based on safety concerns or an amenity reflecting market demand, two common beliefs held by decision-makers. Many residents are likely unwilling to pay for street parking if it is unbundled from housing. The hidden parking policies should be made transparent and subject to public oversight, the double standard between private and public streets should be eliminated, and parking on residential streets should be optional. |
| 总页数： | 66 |
| 报告类型： | 科技报告 |
相关文献
- Residential On-Site Carsharing and Off-Street Parking Policy in the San Francisco Bay Area.
- Residential On-Site Carsharing and Off-Street Parking Policy in the San Francisco Bay Area
- TOWARD A COMMON PARKING POLICY: A CROSS-JURISDICTIONAL MATRIX COMPARISON OF MUNICIPAL OFF-STREET PARKING REGULATIONS IN METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
- Do Suburban Residents Want to Pay for Wide Streets? A Survey on Consumer Preference and Ability to Afford towards Wide Street and On-Street Parking in American Suburbia
- PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND HOUSING AFFORDABILITY: CASE STUDY OF SAN FRANCISCO.
- IMPORTANCE OF PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: A LOOK AT CAR-FREE CITY POLICY IN THE NETHERLANDS.
检索历史
应用推荐
