摘要: |
Achieving the National Academy of Science’s vision of advanced aerial mobility will depend
on significant developments in automation to achieve safe and efficient operations. Flight path
management (FPM) is a major category of automation functionality needed to achieve this
vision. FPM will provide dynamic management of an aircraft’s flight path, ensuring that
it continues to meet five objectives: it is feasible to fly to mission completion, deconflicted
from hazards, coordinated with other traffic, flexible to accommodate future disturbances,
and optimized to meet business objectives. While efforts are underway to advance FPM
technology for the Urban Air Mobility application, the authors present initial design guidelines
for FPM automation capabilities to achieve each of its five objectives based on 15 years of prior
FPM automation research and development. We describe methods to efficiently account for
uncertaintyinthepredictionoftrajectoriesanddiscussadditionalconsiderationsforprioritizing
safety in the design of FPM automation capabilities and interaAchieving the National Academy of Science’s vision of advanced aerial mobility will depend
on significant developments in automation to achieve safe and efficient operations. Flight path
management (FPM) is a major category of automation functionality needed to achieve this
vision. FPM will provide dynamic management of an aircraft’s flight path, ensuring that
it continues to meet five objectives: it is feasible to fly to mission completion, deconflicted
from hazards, coordinated with other traffic, flexible to accommodate future disturbances,
and optimized to meet business objectives. While efforts are underway to advance FPM
technology for the Urban Air Mobility application, the authors present initial design guidelines
for FPM automation capabilities to achieve each of its five objectives based on 15 years of prior
FPM automation research and development. We describe methods to efficiently account for
uncertaintyinthepredictionoftrajectoriesanddiscussadditionalconsiderationsforprioritizing
safety in the design of FPM automation capabilities and interactions between aircraft. We
make recommendations supported by extensive experience gained via previous work with the
Autonomous Operations Planner, an FPM reference automation system developed by NASA.
By employing capable FPM automation supported by cooperative operational flight rules and
information sharing, future aircraft operators will benefit from an increased ability to plan and
execute safe and efficient flights to achieve mission success in a dynamic airspace.ctions between aircraft. We
make recommendations supported by extensive experience gained via previous work with the
Autonomous Operations Planner, an FPM reference automation system developed by NASA.
By employing capable FPM automation supported by cooperative operational flight rules and
information sharing, future aircraft operators will benefit from an increased ability to plan and
execute safe and efficient flights to achieve mission success in a dynamic airspace. |